CardData:OutstandingIssues: Difference between revisions

From Archon Arcana - The KeyForge Wiki
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:
==Issue==
==Issue==
{{RuleData
{{RuleData
|RulesText=In my battleline I have no creatures. My opponent has [[First Officer Frane]] in their battleline. If I play [[Favor of Rex]] and target First Officer Frane, can I capture an Æmber from my opponent and put it on First Officer Frane? Does Favor of Rex's "as if you had played it" effect make First Officer Frane friendly for the purpose of resolving the effect (like it does with "as if you controlled it" in [[Nexus]] and [[Shard of Greed]]) or must I capture to a creature in my battleline?
|RulesText=If I play [[Exhume]] and target half a [[Gigantic]] creature in the discard pile for which I have the other half in my hand, does the Gigantic creature get played or does the effect of Exhume fail?//A card that will allow you to play a single creature from your hand such as [[Helper Bot]], or [[Subject Kirby]] will successfully play a Gigantic creature if both halves of the Gigantic creature are within your hand. However, [[Exhume]]'s ability is targeting a single card in the discard pile and would therefore fail.
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2020-03-31
|RulesDate=2020-11-30
|RulesSource=ArcanaAdvises
|RulesSource=ArcanaAdvises
|RulesPages=
|RulesPages=•Gigantic•Exhume•Deusillus•Niffle Kong•Ultra Gravitron•
|RulesOption1=
|RulesOption1=
}}
}}


==Issue==
==Issue==
Line 134: Line 133:
==Issue==
==Issue==
{{RuleData
{{RuleData
|RulesText=Does the ruling on [[Gigantic]] creatures that "Any card that would let you play a single card (Exhume, Wild Wormhole, Lateral Shift, Phase Shift, Helper Bot, etc.) cannot play a Gigantic creature because that creature is two cards while out of play." apply to card abilities like that of [[Subject Kirby]] that allow you to specifically play a creature?
|RulesText=Should abilities that instruct you to ""Shuffle X into your deck" (such as on [[Not Finished with You]]) be interpreted as "Add X to your deck and shuffle it." or "If X>0, add X to your deck and shuffle it."?
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2022-07-14
|RulesDate=2022-10-26
|RulesSource=
|RulesSource=
|RulesPages=
|RulesPages=
Line 144: Line 143:
==Issue==
==Issue==
{{RuleData
{{RuleData
|RulesText=In my battleline I have a 3 creatures, with [[Sinder]] on the left flank. If I deploy [[Ghosthawk]] between the middle creature and Sinder and then reap with Sinder and destroy Ghosthawk's left neighbor, can I reap with the new neighbor, or is that neighbor now unable to reap because it was not the neighbor at the time Ghosthawk was played? Does "one at a time" on Ghosthawk's text mean anything specifically here?"
|RulesText=If I play [[Grisly Exchange]], do I get to put the cards in any order?
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2022-08-25
|RulesDate=2024-03-26
|RulesSource=
|RulesSource=
|RulesPages=
|RulesPages=
Line 154: Line 153:
==Issue==
==Issue==
{{RuleData
{{RuleData
|RulesText=Does [[Avenging Aura]] need an errata to read "'''Play:''' For the remainder of the turn, each friendly creature gains assault X, where X is the number of forged keys your opponent has."?
|RulesText=How should order be "maintained" when swapping cards in discard and deck for cards like [[Future is Past]]?
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2022-10-10
|RulesDate=2024-03-26
|RulesSource=
|RulesSource=
|RulesPages=
|RulesPages=
|RulesOption1=
|RulesOption1=
}}
}}
==Issue==
==Issue==
{{RuleData
{{RuleData
|RulesText=Should abilities that instruct you to ""Shuffle X into your deck" (such as on [[Not Finished with You]]) be interpreted as "Add X to your deck and shuffle it." or "If X>0, add X to your deck and shuffle it."?
|RulesText=My opponent has multiple creatures in their battleline with more than 3 power as well as [[Reassembling Automaton]]. If I play [[Plague Wind]], it causes an [[Infinite Loops|infinite loop]] where Reassembling Automaton is repeatedly destroyed. How should this be resolved?//In this case, the active player resolves the loop as many times as they wish, and then they adjust the game state by removing Reassembling Automaton from play. After adjusting the game state, play can resume as normal.
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2024-03-28
|RulesSource=ArcanaAdvises
|RulesPages=•Infinite Loops•Reassembling Automaton•Plague Wind•
|RulesOption1=
}}
==Issue==
{{RuleData
|RulesText=If I play [[Animating Force]] and attach it to my opponent's [[Hologrammophone]], is Hologrammophone now a 4-power creature with "Versatile" and "'''Action:''' Ward a creature." in its text box or is it simply a 4-power creature with "Versatile" in its text box?
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2024-04-11
|RulesSource=
|RulesPages=•Animating Force•
|RulesOption1=
}}
 
==Issue==
{{RuleData
|RulesText=I have [[Chronophage]] in my battleline. My opponent plays [[Curse of Cowardice]] into my artifact area. Does Curse of Cowardice gain Omega and cause my opponent's current step to end? What about if I play Curse of Cowardice into my opponent's artifact area?  
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=2022-10-26
|RulesDate=2024-04-12
|RulesSource=
|RulesSource=
|RulesPages=
|RulesPages=•Chronophage•
|RulesOption1=
|RulesOption1=
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:16, 23 May 2024


This page uses this template. which will add these questions to the Outstanding Issues page

{{RuleData
|RulesText=
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=
|RulesSource=ArcanaAdvises
|RulesPages=
|RulesOption1=
}}

Filled out like this:

{{RuleData
|RulesText=This is where the text of the Outstanding issue goes. Separate Questions from Answers with //
|RulesType=For this page this should always be Outstanding Issues
|RulesDate=This is the date the question was sent to FFG in the format YYYY-MM-DD
|RulesSource=For this page, use ArcanaAdvises.
|RulesPages=Put any pages you want to force to show this ruling here
|RulesOption1=If options are needed in the template, they can go here. 
}}

Note that if you do paragraph breaks in your text, you will need to end the text with </p> to close out the text breaks.


Issue

Text My battleline consists of four cards: Bad Penny, Gub, Lollop the Titanic, and King of the Crag. Bad Penny has 1 power, Gub is not on a flank and so has 6 power, Lollop has 11 power,and King of the Crag has 7 for a total of 25 power. If I choose Brobnar and play Might Makes Right to sacrifice all four creatures, the Destroyed: ability on Bad Penny will send it to hand, leaving Gub on a flank meaning he has a power of 1. Does Might Make Right still result in forging a key at no cost?//Yes. When you initially selected the creatures the total power was 25 or greater when they were tagged for destruction. Even though Bad Penny ends up in your hand, it still counts as successfully sacrificed and you will forge a key at no cost.
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2019-09-17
Source ArcanaAdvises
Pages •Might Makes Right•
Option1


Issue

Text If I play Exhume and target half a Gigantic creature in the discard pile for which I have the other half in my hand, does the Gigantic creature get played or does the effect of Exhume fail?//A card that will allow you to play a single creature from your hand such as Helper Bot, or Subject Kirby will successfully play a Gigantic creature if both halves of the Gigantic creature are within your hand. However, Exhume's ability is targeting a single card in the discard pile and would therefore fail.
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2020-11-30
Source ArcanaAdvises
Pages •Gigantic•Exhume•Deusillus•Niffle Kong•Ultra Gravitron•
Option1


Issue

Text In my battleline, I have Gebuk.  My opponent had a Harbinger of Doom in their battleline, and played Skullion, choosing to sacrifice Harbinger of Doom. 

Harbinger of Doom's Destroyed: ability resolves and tags all creatures for destruction. This causes Gebuk to be destroyed, and its Destroyed: ability resolves, playing Teliga.

The question is: Is Teliga played at a point where its ability can resolve? It would seem there are two possible interpretations:

  1. Teliga is played while resolving the Play: ability of Skullion,, which would mean it is "online" within the "after play" window of Skullion, so the FAQ for Spectral Tunneler and Nexus says Teliga should resolve. 
  2. Teliga was not in play when Skullion was played, so therefore can't resolve, similar to the FAQ entry for Tolas and Overlord Greking

Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-01-03
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text If the Active Player plays Hunter or Hunted? and there are no creatures that are currently warded, does the resolution of the Play: ability mean they have to ward a creature?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-02-09
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text On a previous turn, I played Pour-tal, raised the tide and put it into my discard pile. On a subsequent turn, I call Logos and play Think Twice, choosing Pour-tal. Because the tide is already high, Pour-tal goes into my archives.

The question is, does the purge from Think Twice's ability still resolve and purge Pour-tal out of my archives?

Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-05-16
Source
Pages
Option1



Issue

Text In my opponent’s battleline, they have 5 creatures total; 3 creatures in the middle with Com. Officer Hings and Com. Officer Gross on the flanks. In my battleline, I have Replicator. If I reap with Replicator and resolve Com Officer Hings’ Reap: ability, do I draw 3 cards, or does Replicator’s ability do nothing because Com. Officer Gross is not in my battleline?

Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text Can I raise the Tide point at any point during my turn? If so, can I raise it at the start of my turn as a “start of turn effect”?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text In my battleline, I have Lord Invidius in play, and it’s been upgraded with Walls’ Blaster.

On my turn, I reap with Lord Invidius, giving me two Reap: abilities to resolve: Deal 2 damage to a creature from the Blaster, and take control of an opponent’s creature from Lord Invidius. I choose to resolve Lord Invidius first, and take control of a 2 power creature from my opponent. This moves Lord Invidius out of the center of the battleline (causing it to lose its gained Reap: ability). I deal 2 damage to the 2 power creature next to Lord Invidius, destroying it and shifting Lord Invidius back to the center of the battleline, where it gains the Reap: ability again. When the Reap: ability comes back, is it the SAME Reap: ability that was already resolved, or is it a new instance of the Reap: ability, meaning I could resolve it to take control of another creature from my opponent?

Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text My opponent has Strange Gizmo in play, I have The Sting in play. When my opponent forges a key, does The Sting's ability work like a replacement effect here and resolve before Strange Gizmo's ability? If not, are both abilities available to resolve in the "After a player forges a key" window, meaning the Active Player would decide the order?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2022-07-13
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text Should abilities that instruct you to ""Shuffle X into your deck" (such as on Not Finished with You) be interpreted as "Add X to your deck and shuffle it." or "If X>0, add X to your deck and shuffle it."?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2022-10-26
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text If I play Grisly Exchange, do I get to put the cards in any order?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2024-03-26
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text How should order be "maintained" when swapping cards in discard and deck for cards like Future is Past?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2024-03-26
Source
Pages
Option1


Issue

Text My opponent has multiple creatures in their battleline with more than 3 power as well as Reassembling Automaton. If I play Plague Wind, it causes an infinite loop where Reassembling Automaton is repeatedly destroyed. How should this be resolved?//In this case, the active player resolves the loop as many times as they wish, and then they adjust the game state by removing Reassembling Automaton from play. After adjusting the game state, play can resume as normal.
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2024-03-28
Source ArcanaAdvises
Pages •Infinite Loops•Reassembling Automaton•Plague Wind•
Option1

Issue

Text If I play Animating Force and attach it to my opponent's Hologrammophone, is Hologrammophone now a 4-power creature with "Versatile" and "Action: Ward a creature." in its text box or is it simply a 4-power creature with "Versatile" in its text box?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2024-04-11
Source
Pages •Animating Force•
Option1


Issue

Text I have Chronophage in my battleline. My opponent plays Curse of Cowardice into my artifact area. Does Curse of Cowardice gain Omega and cause my opponent's current step to end? What about if I play Curse of Cowardice into my opponent's artifact area?
Type OutstandingIssues
Date 2024-04-12
Source
Pages •Chronophage•
Option1