CardData:OutstandingIssues

This page uses this template. which will add these questions to the Outstanding Issues page

{{RuleData
|RulesText=
|RulesType=OutstandingIssues
|RulesDate=
|RulesSource=ArcanaAdvises
|RulesPages=
|RulesOption1=
}}

Filled out like this:

{{RuleData
|RulesText=This is where the text of the Outstanding issue goes. Separate Questions from Answers with //
|RulesType=For this page this should always be Outstanding Issues
|RulesDate=This is the date the question was sent to FFG in the format YYYY-MM-DD
|RulesSource=For this page, use ArcanaAdvises.
|RulesPages=Put any pages you want to force to show this ruling here
|RulesOption1=If options are needed in the template, they can go here. 
}}

Note that if you do paragraph breaks in your text, you will need to end the text with </p> to close out the text breaks.

Issue

Text	My battleline consists of four cards: Bad Penny, Gub, Lollop the Titanic, and King of the Crag. Bad Penny has 1 power, Gub is not on a flank and so has 6 power, Lollop has 11 power,and King of the Crag has 7 for a total of 25 power. If I choose Brobnar and play Might Makes Right to sacrifice all four creatures, the Destroyed: ability on Bad Penny will send it to hand, leaving Gub on a flank meaning he has a power of 1. Does Might Make Right still result in forging a key at no cost?//Yes. When you initially selected the creatures the total power was 25 or greater when they were tagged for destruction. Even though Bad Penny ends up in your hand, it still counts as successfully sacrificed and you will forge a key at no cost.
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2019-09-17
Source	ArcanaAdvises
Pages	•Might Makes Right•
Option1

Issue

Text	In my battleline, I have Gebuk.  My opponent had a Harbinger of Doom in their battleline, and played Skullion, choosing to sacrifice Harbinger of Doom.  Harbinger of Doom's Destroyed: ability resolves and tags all creatures for destruction. This causes Gebuk to be destroyed, and its Destroyed: ability resolves, playing Teliga. The question is: Is Teliga played at a point where its ability can resolve? It would seem there are two possible interpretations: Teliga is played while resolving the Play: ability of Skullion,, which would mean it is "online" within the "after play" window of Skullion, so the FAQ for Spectral Tunneler and Nexus says Teliga should resolve.  Teliga was not in play when Skullion was played, so therefore can't resolve, similar to the FAQ entry for Tolas and Overlord Greking.
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-01-03
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	If the Active Player plays Hunter or Hunted? and there are no creatures that are currently warded, does the resolution of the Play: ability mean they have to ward a creature?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-02-09
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	On a previous turn, I played Pour-tal, raised the tide and put it into my discard pile. On a subsequent turn, I call Logos and play Think Twice, choosing Pour-tal. Because the tide is already high, Pour-tal goes into my archives. The question is, does the purge from Think Twice's ability still resolve and purge Pour-tal out of my archives?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-05-16
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	In my opponent’s battleline, they have 5 creatures total; 3 creatures in the middle with Com. Officer Hings and Com. Officer Gross on the flanks. In my battleline, I have Replicator. If I reap with Replicator and resolve Com Officer Hings’ Reap: ability, do I draw 3 cards, or does Replicator’s ability do nothing because Com. Officer Gross is not in my battleline?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	Can I raise the Tide point at any point during my turn? If so, can I raise it at the start of my turn as a “start of turn effect”?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	In my battleline, I have Lord Invidius in play, and it’s been upgraded with Walls’ Blaster. On my turn, I reap with Lord Invidius, giving me two Reap: abilities to resolve: Deal 2 damage to a creature from the Blaster, and take control of an opponent’s creature from Lord Invidius. I choose to resolve Lord Invidius first, and take control of a 2 power creature from my opponent. This moves Lord Invidius out of the center of the battleline (causing it to lose its gained Reap: ability). I deal 2 damage to the 2 power creature next to Lord Invidius, destroying it and shifting Lord Invidius back to the center of the battleline, where it gains the Reap: ability again. When the Reap: ability comes back, is it the SAME Reap: ability that was already resolved, or is it a new instance of the Reap: ability, meaning I could resolve it to take control of another creature from my opponent?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2021-06-02
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	My opponent has Strange Gizmo in play, I have The Sting in play. When my opponent forges a key, does The Sting's ability work like a replacement effect here and resolve before Strange Gizmo's ability? If not, are both abilities available to resolve in the "After a player forges a key" window, meaning the Active Player would decide the order?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2022-07-13
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	Does the ruling on Gigantic creatures that "Any card that would let you play a single card (Exhume, Wild Wormhole, Lateral Shift, Phase Shift, Helper Bot, etc.) cannot play a Gigantic creature because that creature is two cards while out of play." apply to card abilities like that of Subject Kirby that allow you to specifically play a creature?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2022-07-14
Source
Pages
Option1

Issue

Text	Should abilities that instruct you to ""Shuffle X into your deck" (such as on Not Finished with You) be interpreted as "Add X to your deck and shuffle it." or "If X>0, add X to your deck and shuffle it."?
Type	OutstandingIssues
Date	2022-10-26
Source
Pages
Option1